Academics and wasting money
I have a lot of respect for academics like Brian Roper and Andrew Geddes but find it interesting that on one hand they state that the smacking citizens initiated referendum - which has no legal impact whatsoever - is an "absolutely appalling waste of money" and the money should be given to CYFS, but on the other hand the question should be better worded.
If the question was better worded, wouldn't the referendum still be a $9 million waste of money if direct democracy has no legal impact?
For that matter, is the Families Commission a waste of money - its budget is $9 million - if it has no legal impact? Have I just identified some reallocation that could go to CYFS so that more real families can be investigated for smacking their kids?
Update Family First's Bob McCoskrie has the answer. The money can come from the MSD in the first place. It's all budged for. Now all we need to do is fire the nosy CYFS managers who tell their social workers to investigate alleged smacking.
Labels: referendum
1 Comments:
Yes, I think that voting in general is a huge waste of money. We should let a panel of academic experts pick the government for us.
sarcasm off.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home