tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6671521.post1932587990427154021..comments2023-10-26T05:03:32.201+13:00Comments on BIG NEWS: Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6671521.post-48177057804416784362008-09-15T16:40:00.000+12:002008-09-15T16:40:00.000+12:00Exactly Dave, and Clark, based on past form, would...Exactly Dave, and Clark, based on past form, would not hesitate to dump Peters on spurious grounds if she saw political advantage. She already has a precedent in this term with Taito Phillip Field who was summarily dumped from the Labour causcus, not for the crime of suggesting that he might go it alone, but for making the suggestion on the day of the PM's State of the Nation speech.Keeping Stockhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13635959917715078192noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6671521.post-47923977763134449962008-09-15T16:28:00.000+12:002008-09-15T16:28:00.000+12:00.. and any such decision to sack Peters will have..... and any such decision to sack Peters will have nothing to do with the cabinet manual.<BR/><BR/>Distancing herself from Peters is nothing to do with Peter's indiscretions, and everything to do with public mood of his indiscretions and the implications it has on Labour.<BR/><BR/>In Clark's view, law, policy and guidelines mean nothing against political expediency .Swimminghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12913329810121951824noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6671521.post-62615385663301253842008-09-15T16:23:00.000+12:002008-09-15T16:23:00.000+12:00Dave - it may not be a sacking offence per se, but...Dave - it may not be a sacking offence per se, but at the speed with which Clark has been distancing herself from Peters over the last few days, it might be just the excuse she needs, without having to wait for natural justice and all that...Keeping Stockhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13635959917715078192noreply@blogger.com